Mercy is a healer who can heal using a beam that requires extremely basic aim and can fly from player to player. Overwatch is a 6 v 6 first person shooter team game where there are lots of different characters to choose from that have very different weapons, skills, and roles, including healers. The progression thing seems to be one that's very easy to "exploit" through gambling mechanisms, it seems to be some sort of built in congitive mechanism that probably benefited us when you needed to plan ahead to build a shelter, or go on a hunt, or go out and get X berries, or anything that required a multi-step process for future planning. It make me think that games can be thought of as combinations of several elements, plot, progression, mechanics, difficulty, etc. And love it or hate it, you can't deny it's brought in a lot more diverse set of players to the game, I've never heard so many female voices in an FPS. You're not trying to get head shots or twitch aim or anything, you're keeping 5 bars full while moving around with very simple mechanics. And plot can be supplied by the player's imagination, fitting in with existing fantasies they hold (writing fantasy dialogues for your virtual pet, or I'm the king of the realm, building it by clicking things).Įven FPSes are changing, in Blizzard's Overwatch, the most loved/despised hero Mercy is "skill-less". The plot is often totally incoherent and a lot of people skip it. Yes, there can be, but a very small portion of the player-base are engaged at that level. MMOs have been wildly popular in the general community, precisely because there are no significantly complex mechanics. There will be an audience for the game, because they like this type of game. Also despite the name, I'm pretty sure you pretty much never click in it past the first 10 minutes.Ī huge chunk of gaming revolves around the mechanics of progression and getting new things. It's more of a long term time based math puzzle than a game, but there is definitely an evolution of mechanics, as you put it. However, since by design the relationship between hundreds of effects (mostly in the form of hero powers) isn't clear, some purchases are easily 100,000,000,000,000% better than others, which is to say one wastes your gold. Gold is roughly upstream of DPS, but There are additive, multiplicative, and even quadratic effects than may be applied to that relationship in the form of hero powers, items?, etc. Try to think of each of them as a graph of growth over time. Ultimately you have (when I tried it a couple of years ago) two main resources, and three meta resources. The person above who said that the optimal way to way would involve spreadsheets is correct, but this one isn't. It's a bit more complicated than that, and you can make decisions which can heavily penalize you. I don't think many people will feel the same way when they're asked to pay $30 before they can even start getting addicted. Once they've spent hundreds of hours progressing, it's not difficult for some people to justify spending money here and there to make things a bit faster. Microtransactions work for this game style because you can take advantage of all the time people feel like they've "invested" into the game. I honestly don't think that charging people up front will work, especially not at a $30 price point. They're a great demonstration of how the illusion of progressing at something is all you need to keep people interested, even when the only thing they're progressing towards is. I'm really surprised to see this from a company that makes, of all possible genres, clicker games.Ĭlicker games usually have almost no actual gameplay, and pretty much only interest people because they exploit many of the same type of psychological tricks that free-to-play games use to keep players hooked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |